India: Come May 31 and we will see pictorial warning on Cigarette Packages

Reality views by sm :


India: Come May 31 and we will see pictorial warning on Cigarette Packages:
One more time, Supreme Court of India has given good judgment by directing to the government that cigarette packages must have pictorial warning like skull and cross bones on cigarette packs.
The sad part is that for this good cause also NGO has to file a case to get this order from Supreme Court of India.
Did you hear about this that any media channel has reported that this type of case is going on in supreme court of India .When there is case like Aarushi rape and murder this media shows it for 24 hours daily but when such a cause arise our media do not give more than few minutes . "Since the 2006 act (mandating pictorial warnings) was passed, the issue was being diluted or delayed for one reason or another by government of India


Even now, had the Supreme Court not stepped in, there would have been further delay."
P.C. Gupta, director of the Healis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, said: "It is most unfortunate that the GoM, since its constitution in early 2007, had delayed the implementation of the law for two whole years, not to mention having diluted the stronger warning for a milder one."
In this order supreme court has added very good note that no other court is permitted to give injunction ,stop, or modify or inconsistent order ,conflicting order with this order this order of supreme court of India ..
Health warning labels on cigarette packages were introduced in the United States in 1965 to inform consumers about the health risks associated with tobacco use. The 1965 Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act required that the statement, Caution: Cigarette smoking may be hazardous to your health.
In 1984, Usa ,Congress enacted the Comprehensive Smoking Education Act, which required rotation of the following four black and white text messages on the side of cigarette packages:
Surgeon General’s warning: Smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and may complicate pregnancy.
Quitting smoking now greatly reduces serious risks to your health.
Smoking by pregnant women may result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight.
Cigarette smoke contains carbon monoxide.
Canada has already method of warning through pictures on the cigarette packages .
Pictures warnings are effective and they really work .Just think when 14 year old boy or 20 year old boy first time will take the cigarette packet in his hands and he sees dangerous and real pictures what cigarette can cause him he may put down the cigarette packet forever.
Just think if Cola bottle has such labels or your sweet box has such labels like showing
Lizards will you eat them or drink them, will you enjoy them.
Twelve countries have laws requiring picture-based health warnings, according to the Canadian Cancer Society, including:

• Australia
• Belgium
• Brazil
• Canada
• Chile •
• Jordan
• New Zealand
• Singapore
• Thailand
• Uruguay
• Venezuela
In UK , people choose 15 pictures which should be used on cigarette packets. We hope in India the chosen pictures will be effective in nature showing like Canada .

Read Full Article...

Taj Mahal the True Story by P.N.Oak : part one

Reality views by sm :
Taj Mahal the True Story by P.N.Oak : part one
Tejo Mahalaya : A Rajput Palace
Just Trying to Understand what Oak has proved in his book as this book is not easily available in India ,Just writing down few important points .
A revolutionary work of historical research by P.N. Oak. In this book, the author tries to prove that Taj Mahal was not built by Shah Jahan but usurped by him from Jai Singh, the king of Jaipur and remodeled before burying Mumtas.Oak gives many proofs to prove his theory that Taj is a ancient Indian palace.
It is a pity that the Taj Mahal is believed to have originated
as a sombre tomb in the 17th century when it was perhaps built in the 4th century to serve as a palace. The author says that claims that far from originating as a mediaeval tomb the Taj was built by a powerful Rajput king as his palace in pre-Muslim times.
the Encyclopedia Britannica states that the Taj Mahal building-complex comprises stables and guest and guard rooms.
the Taj Mahal must have originated as Tejo Mahalaya completed in 1155-56
A.D.




A corollary is that buildings in India and West Asia
which have a resemblance to the Taj Mahal are products of the Indian architecture (Shilpashastra). People should look Taj Mahal as a palace and not as a tomb then they will realize the beauty of palace with people just go there, see 2 toms and leave the Taj.
Laymen sometimes ask that if the Taj Mahal existed centuries
before Mumtaz's death in 1630-31, could not the radioactive carbon
- 14 test be applied to determine its age? This is a question for
experts to answer. If they have an infallible method they .would
certainly detect the difference in age of the material used in the
cenotaphs and in most other parts of the Taj Mahal. But for any
such test to be useful its margin of error must be precisely known.
A five to ten years’ margin would not matter very much but if
it extends to several centuries the test would be unsuitable to
verify the accuracy of the conclusion drawn from historical evidence
that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu building commandeered for use as
a Muslim tomb.
A carbon-14 test has actually been carried out by a New York-based
laboratory, around 1974 A.D., on a piece of timber from a broken,
softened doorway plank of the rear, river-side, northeast doorway
of the Taj. It proved that the timber doorway pre. dated Shahjahan
by about 300 years.
Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya palace complex has existed centuries before
Shahjahan.
It needs to be realized that Islam originated in Mecca only 1370
years ago. In other lands swept by Islam it is not even that ancient.
the Tajmahal
complex consists of several seven-storied edifices of which only
garden level floors are open to the public while the others are either
sealed with brick and lime by Shahjahan or are kept intriguingly
locked by the Indian Government’s Archaeological Survey of India
(ASI).
Had the ASI been honest to its job it would have dredged
even the water in the seven-storied well to see whether important
articles, idols or inscriptions lie jettisoned there.
The conclusion whether it was Shahjahan who started raising
the Taj Mahal in 1631 A.D. as a sepulcher or it was some Hindu
Maharaja who had built it centuries earlier is not to be considered
as a Hindu-Muslim dispute and therefore to be severely shunned.
It is a question of scientific, academic competence and arriving
at a correct judgment as being able to distinguish between brass
and gold.
Our research has firmly established that the term Taj Mahal
is a popular mispronunciation of the ancient Hindu name
Tejomahalaya.
Yet we feel that more research needs to be done by opening
up the thousands of sealed chambers of the several seven-storied
buildings and other multi -storied edifices (such as the Nagar Khanas )
to probe their hidden contents since they could yield a number
of idols, inscriptions, coins, documents etc.
Shahjahan's court chronicle the Badshanama
acknowledges it as 'Manzil-e-Raja Mansingh' (i. e. Raja Mansingh's
mansion). Thus Raja Mansingh was the last Hindu owner in the
chequered and scarred history of the Taj Mahal.
The author demands that ,
All the locked rooms in all the multi-storied buildings in the Taj Mahal
complex should be open to visitors The ASI should be directed
to open up all the rooms in all the stories of all the buildings
barred by Shahjahan with brick and lime and study the evidence
that may be discovered Free entry on Fridays causing a revenue
loss to the Government should be discontinued because there is
no mosque in the Tejomahalaya premises.
Author says that in ancient times this palace was a Shiva temple then in a period of time it became the palace .
So many concocted accounts of the mythical Shahjahan
authorship of the Taj Mahal have been afloat for the last 350 years
that one wonders how they never aroused anybody's suspicion.
Thus we have scholar after scholar of Indian history from almost
every part of the world rapturously recounting to us how the cost
of the Taj Mahal could be anything between four to ninety million
rupees, the designer could be anybody from a Turk, Persian or
Italian to a Frenchman, the period of construction could be anywhere
between 10 and 22 years, and Mumtaz, the so-called Lady of the
Taj Mahal, could have been buried in its basement or upper floor
at any time from six months to nine years after her death. These
are only a few absurdities, anomalies and inconsistencies of the
Taj Mahal story. There are many more which we propose to expose
in the following pages.
Before believing in the "fabulous mausoleum" theory, two
questions may be asked. Firstly, where are the historical records
describing Shahjahan's romantic attachment to Mumtaz - one of
his 5,000 consorts, prior to her death ? Secondly, how many palaces
did Shahjahan build for his sweetheart Mumtaz while she was alive
before he built one over her dead body ?
Histories are silent on both these points. The answer to the
first is that there are no accounts of the Shahjahan Mumtaz romance
because there never was any. That so called romantic attachment
was a graft to justify the mythical creation of the Taj Mahal as
a wonder tomb. The answer to the second question is that Shahjahan
did not build any palace for Mumtaz alive or dead.
Every Moghul monarch had at least 5,000 consorts in his harem and many more at his
command outside. He had hardly the time or the heart to idolize
only one of his several thousand consorts. The author has in his book states,takes help from following old books .
P. 3 The History of India as Told by its Own Historians. Vol.
VII, The Posthumous Papers of the late Sir H. M. Elliot, K.C.B. edited
by Professor John Dowson, M.R.A.S., published by Kitab Mahal (Private)
Ltd. 56-A Zero Road, Allahabad.
2. Persian text of Mulla Abdul Hamid's Badshahnama, in two volumes,
published by the Asiatic Society of Bengal in the Bibliotheca Indies series.
I obtained the photostat from the copy in the National Archives, Government
of India, in December 1966. Copies of that publication are available in
all important institutional libraries throughout the world, dealing with Indian
mediaeval history. Following are the just few lines which I am here reproducing it .
During the journey countless coins be distributed among the
fakirs and needy, The site covered with a majestic magnificent lush garden, to the south of that great city and Amidst which (garden) the building known as the palace
(Manzil) of Raja Mansingh, at present owned by Raja Jaisingh, Grandson (of Mansingh), was selected for the burial of the Queen whose abode is in heaven Although Raja Jaisingh valued it greatly as his ancestral heritage and property, yet. he would have been agreeable to part with it gratis for the Emperor Shahjahan . (Still) out of sheer scrupulousness so essential in matters of bereavement and religious sanctity (thinking it improper to take his palace gratis) . In exchange of that (aali Manzil) grand palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of government land.

Emperor Shahjahan's wife Arjumand Banu died in Burhanpur
somewhere between 1629 and 1632 A.D. Her body was buried in
a garden there but is said to have been exhumed after about six
months and transported to Agra. Even this single detail should
have been enough to alert discerning and thoughtful people that
Shahjahan must have come by a handy ready-made mausoleum.
Why else would he disturb and remove a body well laid to rest
and have it carried to Agra, 600 miles away! He wouldn't want
it to be transferred from one open grave to another without some
purpose. Even a commoner's body is not so trifled with, let alone
that of a queen and believed to be a very 'beloved' one at that.
Moreover if Shahjahan had really commisioned the Taj Mahal he
should have raised it at Burhanpur where Mumtaz was already buried.
Such careful checking at every stage, so essential for accurate
historical research has been lacking in the field of Indian history.
On arrival in Agra, Mumtaz's body was buried underneath the
dome of Mansingh's palatial mansion under royal command, says
the Badshahnama. the Badshahnama clearly
asserts that it was Jaisingh who was given land while Shahjahan
got Mansingh's garden palace in exchange. This is one more detail
proving how the entire Shahjahan legend of the Taj Mahal is wholly
fictitious from beginning to end.
The Mumtaz burial story is so confusing ,gives so many different views that
One doubts that and says that Taj Mahal is a ancient Indian palace.
the exchange itself sounds a mere
myth because the location and dimensions of the plot of land given
to Jaisingh are not mentioned.
The palace had a sky-high dome underneath which, the author
of the Badshanama tells us, Mumtaz's body was hidden (i.e. buried)
from the eyes of the world by the officials of the realm at Shahjahan's
command. Such command again was unnecessary unless Mumtaz
had to be buried in somebody else's property. The use of the word
' 'command" is thus significant. We shall show that 104 years earlier
Emperor Babur also refers to this domed palace.
The Badshahnama clearly tells us that the Hindu
palace taken over for Mumtaz's burial had a dome. Incidentally
the edifice is also described as a "sky-high" mansion, though
those adjectives have been also interlinked with Shahjahan's courage
and valour.
Shahjahan's own court-chronicler admits the Taj Mahal to be a domed Hindu palace
commandeered for queen Mumtaz's burial.
"Jean Baptiste Tavernier, a French jeweler, toured India for
trade between 1641 and 1668 A. D. His travel account is mainly
devoted to commerce. He used to sojourn at Surat and Agra.
Mumtaz had died sometime between
1629 and 1632. Tavernier arrived in India nearly 11 years after
Mumtaz's demise.
according to Tavernier no work was undertaken concerning Mumtaz's tomb at least for 11 years after her death. Muslim and Tavernier's versions. Some of the former say that the Taj Mahal was complete by 1643 while Tavernier tells us that
the work concerning the mausoleum was not even begun by at
least 1641.
Shahjahan had been deposed and
incarcerated by his son Emperor Aurangzeb in 1658. Tavernier also
notes that the work took 22 years to complete. That means that
even if the work began in 1641 it ended only in 1663. This was
impossible since Shahjahan was no longer on the throne after 1658.
From olden times Muslim kings a tradition can be found is that they took readymade palaces and converted them to tomb or converted to Islamic buildings .
We would also like to draw the reader's attention to Tavernier's
words, "Shahjahan purposely made the tomb near the Tasimacan
(which had six large courts) where all foreigners come, so that
the whole world should see and admire it." The word Tasimacan
is Taz-i-macan, i.e. royal residence, which is synonymous with
Taj Mahal. That is to say, the Hindu palace was known as Tasimacan
alias Taj Mahal even before Mumtaz's burial, according to Tavernier.
Tavernier's remark that Shahjahan had to use bricks even to
a support arch is of special significance. It means that the "arches"
existed already. It may be noted that Koranic engravings on the
Taj Mahal are made around the arches. When the original stone
slabs were removed by Shahjahan and were substituted by other
slabs with the Muslim lettering, the arches so tampered with had
to be supported with bricks. So this part of Tavernier's observation
also proves that the Taj Mahal with its arched entrances existed
even before Mumtaz's death.
British Scholar Keene states that Tavernier could
be in India only sometime between the years 1651-1655.
Tavernier's noting makes out four specific points, namely :
1. That Shahjahan purposely buried Mumtaz near a bazaar known
as Tasimacan (i.e. Taj Mahal). 2. That he could not get any timber
for the scaffolding. 3. That the cost of the scaffolding was more
than that of the entire work. 4. That 20,000 laborers worked
incessantly for 22 years.
Of the above the first three points clearly imply that Shahjahan
took over a ready Taj Mahal for Mumtaz's burial. The fourth point
on which traditional historians have banked does not make any
sense when it is considered that a Tavernier staying in India only
for four years (1651-1655) cannot assert that the work which began
and ended in his presence lasted for 22 years.
This shows that Tanvir is not reliable .
Tanvirs statements support Mr.Oak statements as well as what we read in our history books .So he is not reliable.

Continued :

Read Full Article...

India says goodbye to Voting

Reality views by sm:
India elections 2009 A tragedy or a comedy show:
India says goodbye to voting.
What we learned in this elections as an Indian.
Indian democracy is for rich by rich and a comedy or tragedy show for common Indians.
Salman khan and Pretty Zinta did not vote I don’t know reason I request you when you will support them or watch there movies remember this they didn’t vote for common mans India.
Even Common man of India is shameless, they came they killed us but you slept and enjoyed movies or visited to goa and London to enjoy on the eve of voting day.
Shame on India.
How our parliament will now look?




Now our parliament will look like this all rich people or gundas will be our member of parliament. You will say so what?
Now what happens is that if he is gunda, CBI and police department obey him and they will follow his order and he will continue to do his bad activities and get relief from courts, judiciary as investigating departments will obey and do as he orders.
Now if rich man becomes Member of Parliament what he will do?
He will see that he tax choris , tax cases and frauds be legalized. 2nd is he will get all locations, lands at such a low rate that you can say it is as good as free.
Example is if someone gets land of 1000 crore from government of India in just rupees
200 crore or 40 crore what you will say?
3rd ly he will build the big hotels and malls on the reserved lands of army or reserved land for schools and school grounds, when construction is finished, our government babus will make it legal.
Today you have not voted remember your kids will kick you for this because you have destroyed there life and future by not voting for good candidates.
I wanted to say hey in India we don’t have democracy here, here its mob rule, money rule, power rule .and black mail rules.
What is Indian democracy: A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.
We saw this how many people voted and they like cowards hide in there homes.
I think we don’t need to give the holiday on the day of election on that place companies should see that employee goes and votes then, his manager checks he has voted or not
Then he can go home or work. We don’t deserve holiday on the day of election voting.
Don’t you think when we will get new prime minister he will be like biggest joke, as he is elected by only less than 50% or 45 or 25%?
Indian democracy has become a biggest joke on this earth.
Did you voted? If not Remember you are saying good bye to the good future of your kids .They will say good bye to you one day when you will need there help, why they should live in a corrupt country with corrupt parents.
Corruption is our national religion .I think they need bribes to go to voting booths also.
How much bribe you want corrupt Indians to vote?
What is reason you are not voting if you are not corrupt?
I hope next time Mr. Rich will make such advertisements vote and earn.
Even election commission of India should make bribes legal when they are offered as encouragement to vote, currently they give such notes illegally to uneducated people or slum people .Once it is legal they will give these offers to all Indians, and we will have more than 75% voting in India.

Read Full Article...

Vote for Party or a Good Candidate:

Reality views by sm:
Vote for Party or a Good Candidate:
This is very confusing situation for every voter.
I came to see and realize that many people in India say that vote for party without thinking about the candidate, his background and education to the candidate whom party has given the election ticket.
This is totally wrong concept to vote for party.
Majority times you can see that parties give tickets to there relatives or loyal candidates who may be corrupt .
In India parties are run like a hereditary property and business .
Just like ,The son of Ceo becomes Ceo,the son of manager becomes manager and son of office boy becomes office boy .



Lets find out how to vote and to whom vote party or candidate.
Let’s study one example:
Suppose party C has a good manifesto but party C gives ticket to a candidate who is criminal or rapist because he can use his power and win the election.
So in this case will you say that a voter should still vote for a party C.?
Example 2:
Suppose Party B has a manifesto which voter do not like ,
he feels this manifesto will end up breaking India but This party B gives ticket to very honest person so in this case
Do you think he should vote for Party B?
Example 3:
Suppose voter decides to vote ,then checks the names of the candidates who are standing for election and comes to know that 1st candidate is corrupt 2nd candidate is rapist
3rd candidate is uneducated never went to school 4th candidate is deshdrohi 5th candidate is murderer .
so in this situation to whom a voter should vote?

In India situation is that every party has their own manifesto and the member of party has to follow that rules he like it or not he has to vote accordingly as per party orders. An elected candidate can not go against party .He has to obey the party orders and his leader,high command.
In a first example do you think this criminal candidate will do anything good for his city or his nation, will he ever go to parliament or study and propose good laws.
In a 2nd example
do you think this honest person can change the manifesto and policy of the party .No he can not he has to vote and support the wrong policy of party.
In 3rd situation
voter will stay home he wont go to vote. For this situation we need right to recall the candidate as well as none of the above options on ballot machine with rule that if none of the above option gets votes more than 51% or 51% then in this there will be new election with new candidates and all those candidates will lose to stand for elections 2nd time .
Only and best solution for voter is that
he should check the candidate,his education and vote for him he is educated .
2nd rule for voting is that vote for new candidates only .
Never vote for 2nd time candidates who stand for election .When elected member of parliament has not done anything in 1st five years as member of parliament he will never do any good work in next 5 years.
A dog tail remains same, whatever one does it will not change.
So best option is always vote for educated and first time candidate who is not above the age of 65.
Because BJP or Congress they have same agenda. And regional parties also have same agenda, to win few sits and then do a business with that few sits for the support.
To form coalition government in the centre.
Government of India will never fix retirement age for politicians but you as a voter should fix the retirement age for politicians in your heart.
So vote for good independent educated and first timer who is trying his hand at elections because he has shown courage to standup for you and me.
A party can not change its ideals when someone joins the party it means that he accepts the ideology of that party .
A person may say he believes in non violence but if he joins violent party this means that he supports the policy of violent party to beat the people and take law in hands of party .
Joining a political party is like a marriage. When ever there is a conflict between marriage there is divorce .Marriage stays only until there is agreement and same thoughts and vision. Husband and wife both have to stay on the same vision and same path as soon as one changes his path, vision there is divorce.
In this way a ideology of political party becomes supreme and
currently in India our national parties don’t have any ideology , all national parties have same ideology ,do or die but get the chair do blackmailing or corruption but get the chair. .
“One person can make a difference and every person should try.”
That person is a candidate who is standing for elections for first time, in whose family history, he is the first one and he is educated is the best and ideal candidate to select.
Don’t vote for party or caste or religion vote for new,educated,young candidate only.
If still you feel vote for party is correct then make a rule that the political party has a future vision for India like economic reservation, retirement age for politicians, accountability for politicians, and party who is ready to give it in writing and making affidavit that they will fulfill there promise and or pay fines .The party which is ready to give their manifesto document a status of legal document like a sale deed or marriage agreement or Agreement to sale .
Currently party manifesto, there agenda and promises have value zero.
They don’t have any liability or accountability .
In last 50 years these parties have not made any changes, do you think now they will make changes?
“What has once happened, will invariably happen again, when the same circumstances which combined to produce it, shall again combine in the same way”

Read Full Article...

Modern India and caste system effects.

RealityViews by sm:
Modern India and caste system effects.
It is not possible to break Caste without annihilating the religious notions on
Which it, the Caste system, is founded."

The real method of breaking up the Caste System was not to bring about inter-caste dinners and inter-caste Marriages but to destroy the religious notions on which Caste was founded

Caste is the monster that Crosses your path.
You cannot have political reform,
you cannot have economic Reform, unless you kill this monster that is caste system of India, Racism of India.



It is a pity that Caste even today has its defenders.
The defenses are many.
It Is defended on the ground that the Caste System is but another name for division
Of labour

The first and foremost thing that must be recognized is that Hindu Society is a
Myth. The name Hindu is itself a foreign name.
It was given by the Mohammedans to the natives for the purpose of distinguishing themselves. It does not occur in any Sanskrit work prior to the Mohammedan invasion.
They did Not feel the necessity of a common name because they had no conception of
Their having constituted a community.
Hindu society as such does not exist.
It is only a collection of castes.
Each caste is conscious of its existence. Its survival is the be all and end all of its existence. Castes do not even form a federation. A caste has no feeling that it is affiliated to other castes except when there is a Hindu-Muslim riot.

On all other occasions each caste endeavours to segregate Itself and to distinguish itself from other castes. Each caste not only dines among Itself and marries among itself but each caste prescribes its own distinctive Dress.
What other explanation can there be of the innumerable styles of dress
Worn by the men and women of India which so amuse the tourists?

Indeed the Ideal Hindu must be like a rat living in his own hole refusing to have any contact
With others. There is an utter lack among the Hindus of what the sociologists call
“Consciousness of kind “.
There is no Hindu consciousness of kind. In every Hindu the consciousness that exists is the consciousness of his caste. That is the Reason why the Hindus cannot be said to form a society or a nation. There are However many Indians whose patriotism does not permit them to admit that
Indians are not a nation, that they are only an amorphous mass of people.

They Have insisted that underlying the apparent diversity there is a fundamental unity
Which marks the life of the Hindus in as much as there is a similarity of habits and
Customs, beliefs and thoughts which obtain all over the continent of India.
Similarity in habits and customs,
Caste System prevents common activity and by preventing common activity it
Has prevented the Hindus from becoming a society with a unified life and a
Consciousness of its own being.

The Brahmin's primary concern is to protect “his interest “against
Those of the non-Brahmins and the non-Brahmin's primary concern is to protect
Their interests against those of the Brahmins.
The Hindus, therefore, are not Merely an assortment of castes but they are so many warring groups each living For itself and for its selfish ideal The existence of Caste and Caste
Consciousness has served to keep the memory of past feuds between castes Green and has prevented solidarity.

Hindus must follow Vedas and the Smites without reasoning, if he finds there is conflict between them Manu and Mahabharata it is said that Hindu should choose 1 and follow it blindly, he should not try to find which is correct, he should not try to find defects into the Vedas and smritis.
If we say that it is forbidden to critique on Vedas and smirits will be correct. They must be blindly, without thinking, without finding objections be followed.

In one of the lectures given in year 1936 by Dr.B.R. AMBEDKAR, Babasaheb said regarding Religion Reforms, and suggested following rules.
(1) There should be one and only one standard book of Hindu Religion,
Acceptable to all Hindus and recognized by all Hindus. This of course means that
All other books of Hindu religion such as Vedas, Shastras and Puranas, which
Are treated as sacred and authoritative, must by law cease to be so and the
Preaching of any doctrine, religious or social contained in these books should be
Penalized.

(2) It should be better if priesthood among Hindus was abolished. But
As this seems to be impossible, the priesthood must at least cease to be
Hereditary. Every person who professes to be a Hindu must be eligible for being
A priest. It should be provided by law that no Hindu shall be entitled to be a priest
Unless he has passed an examination prescribed by the State and holds a sanad
From the State permitting him to practice.

(3) No ceremony performed by a priest
Who does not hold a sanad shall be deemed to be valid in law and it should be
Made penal for a person who has no sanad to officiate as a priest. (4) A priest
Should be the servant of the State and should be subject to the disciplinary action
By the State in the matter of his morals, beliefs and worship, in addition to his
Being subject along with other citizens to the ordinary law of the land.
The Hindus must consider whether the time has not come for them to
Recognize that there is nothing fixed, nothing eternal, nothing sanatan; that
Everything is changing, that change is the law of life for individuals as well as for
Society. In a changing society, there must be a constant revolution of old values
And the Hindus must realize that if there must be standards to measure the acts
Of men there must also be a readiness to revise those standards.
But Hindus are slaves of caste and do not want to destroy
It.
But Mr.Gandhi never agreed with Dr.B.R. Ambedkar.
Mr Gandhi supported caste system but he himself never followed the caste system, Varna system.

I just mentioned in this article what Ambedkar said in 1936, today if anyone says this
do you think people will beat him, or someone who dares to say this in openly in India.

Currently as per my views and thoughts Today India has become the society of mob rule who does not care for India ,who do not support each other, honest people do not support each other to just save there job or to stay away from the police department.

People do not have trust on judiciary and police, when people face problems they will stay in home and if they have to go to someone they may go to Gundas, political gundas for help even for school admission to driving licence, to shop license they go to illegal agent or political gunda.
When we Indians are correct, honest why we need to go to Agent or political gunda
To get our work done in a timely manner.

All this is happening because of our caste system, people before helping each other want to know which caste or religion he belongs then they decides help or no help.

Reservation or no reservation. One of the reasons now a days we have
Coalition government is also result of this caste system and religion only; as one caste goes and votes for his caste they don’t take. Notice or even think that there caste candidate is rapist or murderer. For them important is caste and religion not India.

If our caste system and religion is good then I always think that what is the reason there is Only one Vivekananda, only one Shivaji,

Why we Indians do not have another Bhagat Singh another Sukhdev, another Tilak or Bose .

Why only few percent Hindus are good examples and majority are educated to be just munims or clerks .
In this elections we saw even foreign educated, as well as Indian educated people didn’t go there to vote .I call them educated but uneducated people. There is some problem within us only.

Why the worst are in billions and the best so few.

In India, I feel caste system and our religion should be reformed as this is also one of the problems which do not allow us to be Indians. Truly Indians irrespective of caste and religion. And state and language.

Rightfully in a year 1940,Mr.churchill has said that India is not ready to become independent nation, India is not ready socially as well as education wise to become independent nation ,if it becomes independent India will be ruled by uneducated ,or criminals and today we can see that who is ruling us .

Read Full Article...